Oh, looks like you can get discussion on a post, and it's threaded, too, simply by virtue of replies being themselves posts that you can reply to.
TBH I did like unthreaded replies on G+; it was more like a normal conversation.
Also, I think that the editor expects single newlines, but doesn't visually display that quite like it'll end up in a published post. I have a habit, from text editors, of doing double-newlines! So I thought, based on the look of the editor, that I should, and then the resultant post looked spaaaaaaaced ouuuuuuuut.
Also, cmd-return doesn't post. Let's see if ctrl-return does. Nope!
Oh, and Masto displays things fine but:
- Strips all Markdown formatting.
- Ignores CWs.
The first I can live with, but the second would seem to pose a defederation risk, because it makes it seem like you're not playing along nicely.
Weird. It doubles the image when I view the post in-detail.
Oh, looks like you can get discussion on a post, and it's threaded, too, simply by virtue of replies being themselves posts that you can reply to.
TBH I did like unthreaded replies on G+; it was more like a normal conversation.
Also, I think that the editor expects single newlines, but doesn't visually display that quite like it'll end up in a published post. I have a habit, from text editors, of doing double-newlines! So I thought, based on the look of the editor, that I should, and then the resultant post looked spaaaaaaaced ouuuuuuuut.
Also, cmd-return doesn't post. Let's see if ctrl-return does. Nope!
A long post to try this out
So as I understand it, Bonfire doesn't do a character limit like Mastodon does. This is potentially a long-form posting thing.Is is a commenting-on thing? No, I guess not. But it does otherwise feel a lot more like G+, particularly in that it has a close analogue to Circles.Does...
Kit
Weird. It doubles the image when I view the post in-detail.
A long post to try this out
So as I understand it, Bonfire doesn't do a character limit like Mastodon does. This is potentially a long-form posting thing.Is is a commenting-on thing? No, I guess not. But it does otherwise feel a lot more like G+, particularly in that it has a close analogue to Circles.Does...
Kit
Intent:
Unknown type of activity/object
This is a test message
Where i just some lines
to this how the markdown is rendered
My guess is that the markdown is not rendered the same way
in the first post
and in the replies
I just discovered Bonfire with this toot tonight
I never read about it before
I'm interested in fediverse, i don't know how i missed it until now
The interface looks amazlingly beautiful 👏 ! (especially for an open source project :ok_hand:)
Intent:
Unknown type of activity/object
Why this post is well formatted in markdown ?
But this one is in a edition state (Edit the name Feedback about "Share a feedback"
Edit the description) ?
Intent:
Unknown type of activity/object
To reply, there is an input with the placeholder write something
As the input grow as i type lines in it, I would expect to be able to clic under the line of the placeholder
Apparently Silicon Valley is seeing a dot com crash coming?
Hi @Antonela, sorry it was a "me" problem because I could just (and have) completed the survey from a Windows computer at my university. But it’s also the problem that the Framasoft servers are de facto kinda large and well-known and thus are targeted by criminals through spam bots, who use the Tor network to stay anonymous, so Framasoft have to block Tor exit nodes.
Good to know that you were able to complete the survey! Each answer added us a lot. On the other hand it is good to know that about Framasoft.
Love the new icons @ivan!
