boundaries and circles atm they're not really usable, we've been iterating through different UXs, and we plan to work on them in the coming month
, the first time a message appear Unblocked ; why `
When i ghost myself, on the Settings > Ghosted page i am in the list, there is a button Unghost , when i click on the "Unghost" button :
- the first time, a message appear "Unblocked" ; why "Unblocked" and not "Unghosted" ?
- the second time, a message appear "Could not unblock", why the blocked user is not removed from the ghosted list when i clicked the first time ?
On the reply, there is 3 dots buttons, in this context menu, there is the option "Delete this Respond from feeds" that is larger than the context menu ; also why "Respond" with a capitalized "R" ?
I can "Reply" to a "Post" but i can delete my "Respond" ; do there is differences between "Reply" and "Respond" ?
For consistency reason, i would expect to have the same word used every where
Unknown type of activity/object
, the first time a message appear Unblocked ; why `
When i ghost myself, on the Settings > Ghosted page i am in the list, there is a button Unghost , when i click on the "Unghost" button :
- the first time, a message appear "Unblocked" ; why "Unblocked" and not "Unghosted" ?
- the second time, a message appear "Could not unblock", why the blocked user is not removed from the ghosted list when i clicked the first time ?
In the last UI update, I don't see the "load more" button? (And I don't miss it?) @BonfireBuilders #bonfire_feedback
I'm not saying you should drop the "load more" button but I'd be interested to see builds that explicitly exclude it @BonfireBuilders #bonfire_feedback
In the last UI update, I don't see the "load more" button? (And I don't miss it?) @BonfireBuilders #bonfire_feedback
Oh, looks like you can get discussion on a post, and it's threaded, too, simply by virtue of replies being themselves posts that you can reply to.
TBH I did like unthreaded replies on G+; it was more like a normal conversation.
Also, I think that the editor expects single newlines, but doesn't visually display that quite like it'll end up in a published post. I have a habit, from text editors, of doing double-newlines! So I thought, based on the look of the editor, that I should, and then the resultant post looked spaaaaaaaced ouuuuuuuut.
Also, cmd-return doesn't post. Let's see if ctrl-return does. Nope!
Oh, and Masto displays things fine but:
- Strips all Markdown formatting.
- Ignores CWs.
The first I can live with, but the second would seem to pose a defederation risk, because it makes it seem like you're not playing along nicely.
Weird. It doubles the image when I view the post in-detail.
Oh, looks like you can get discussion on a post, and it's threaded, too, simply by virtue of replies being themselves posts that you can reply to.
TBH I did like unthreaded replies on G+; it was more like a normal conversation.
Also, I think that the editor expects single newlines, but doesn't visually display that quite like it'll end up in a published post. I have a habit, from text editors, of doing double-newlines! So I thought, based on the look of the editor, that I should, and then the resultant post looked spaaaaaaaced ouuuuuuuut.
Also, cmd-return doesn't post. Let's see if ctrl-return does. Nope!
A long post to try this out
Weird. It doubles the image when I view the post in-detail.
A long post to try this out
Unknown type of activity/object
This is a test message
Where i just some lines
to this how the markdown is rendered
My guess is that the markdown is not rendered the same way
in the first post
and in the replies
I just discovered Bonfire with this toot tonight
I never read about it before
I'm interested in fediverse, i don't know how i missed it until now
The interface looks amazlingly beautiful 👏 ! (especially for an open source project :ok_hand:)