☕ Currently reading: https://botpopuli.net/transforming-digital-platforms-for-the-people-and-planet/"Exploring the paradox of social movements utilizing monopolized social media to promote messages of global justice while examining the means by which activists and the larger public can shift to freer and fairer options.Monopolistic digital platforms have taken over our daily lives, which directly impacts the way social movements and civil societies build networks and solidarities across borders. The use of social media as tools for communication, messaging, advocacy, and even mobilization during crucial political moments (e.g., Black Lives Matter, Colombian, and Chilean collective risings) undercuts these platforms’ exploitation and commodification of their users. Most activists use social media platforms to raise awareness and amplify messages among large populations. Thus, the immediate dilemma faced by activists is either remaining subsumed and, in a way, contributing to the vicious exploitation of collective data, or losing a wider audience. This quandary can be addressed by using mainstream media while promoting a transition towards autonomous platforms that are designed and operate to put the well-being of people first."

@mayel the "you can't destroy the master's house with the master's tools" saying comes to mind.


This is more like "renting a cupboard in the master's house, paying with your attention, legitimation and presence"


I'm somehow motivated to join some fb groups and try get them to come over....

I've always kept it mind what Dave Winer (creator of RSS) advised: to publish in a place under your control (basically hosted on your own domain name) with that always being the canonical home for your stuff, and then syndicating wherever you want (linking back to the source). I think the same can apply for community and discussions. Why not use the closed platforms like one would dump leaflets out of an airplane over an authoritarian territory?