Bug report, when I changethe boundary of a taskit erases all the fields @BonfireBuilders #bonfire_feedback
Loading...
seems interesting....
The "I don't deserve to be who I am" to "I don't deserve to do these chores quickly and then spend the rest of my time translating libre software projects" pipeline (it's real, sorry I'll try to improve this quickly, I've been back into the closet for the entire day)
💀 La fête des morts / Halloween approche 💀
Alors mourir, pourquoi pas, mais sans le diesel s'il-vous-plaît …
… et c'est faisable en 🚲️ Corbicyclette 🚲️
https://www.ouest-france.fr/pays-de-la-loire/loire-atlantique/le-tout-premier-corbillard-a-velo-vient-de-sortir-il-a-ete-fabrique-pres-de-nantes-119b29c2-56c2-11ed-844b-6884844cd59f
#vélo #écologie
Dunque, vediamo a che punto sono qui... CLICK
No ma quindi è possibile progettare software che non rimangano confinati nella visione colonna centrale stretta e carattere piccolo perché l'unica cosa al mondo che conta sono gli smartphone? 😱
Cioè, sono scioccata...
Avec 🏹Willy Schraen🔫, on ne sait jamais où commence le lobbying et où se termine la plaisanterie …
#chasse #willyschraen
There's nothing like the joy of seeing a brand new error when debugging something.
I think your observation may have to do with privacy? If using a pseudonym one can't share too many details about their personal life or local area for fear of getting doxed, and if using one's real name there's the need to preserve the agency and privacy of the people close to you (I think the fediverse has so far followed Twitter as opposed to Facebook, in that most people are connected to a different, mostly virtual, social network with little overlap with the one they participate in physically, so it may feel strange to talk to about them with "strangers" rather than with them). In both cases, I think there's a tendency to compartmentalise one's public identity on social media and only post about certain topics.
I hope Bonfire extensions like Topics and Circles & Boundaries (and Groups soon) can help address some of these. Not just as a technical "solution" but in meeting some unmet needs for more people and hopefully make federated social networking more integrated with the full spectrums of our social/political/economic/communal lives...
@mayel @bhaugen Mastodon users are abuse victims and ProtonMail was predating on these people before the v4.0 and removing their presence from the Fediverse. They probably don't want to talk about their families; in my personal case, I never wanted to blame mine for what happened to me (that was related to my transidentity, so not their fault, but I wasn't sure a few years ago). It's also still a gamified space with little more to offer than followers counts, leading to all sorts of gaslightings including the impossibility to criticize what's being gamified (i.e. what they associate with a quantitative feedback, be it followers, a paycheck, or experience points).
Nobody on the Fediverse seems to have families.
Sometimes if you read their profiles they claim to have families but then that claim is almost never reflected in what they post.
Likewise, nobody seems to exist in political units at levels lower than the national.
I believe that the Fediverse has become a waystation on our way to turning ourselves into bots, a way of rendering us ineffective in what we, with increasing derision, call "the real world".
#SeizeTheMeansOfCommunity
I think your observation may have to do with privacy? If using a pseudonym one can't share too many details about their personal life or local area for fear of getting doxed, and if using one's real name there's the need to preserve the agency and privacy of the people close to you (I think the fediverse has so far followed Twitter as opposed to Facebook, in that most people are connected to a different, mostly virtual, social network with little overlap with the one they participate in physically, so it may feel strange to talk to about them with "strangers" rather than with them). In both cases, I think there's a tendency to compartmentalise one's public identity on social media and only post about certain topics.
I hope Bonfire extensions like Topics and Circles & Boundaries (and Groups soon) can help address some of these. Not just as a technical "solution" but in meeting some unmet needs for more people and hopefully make federated social networking more integrated with the full spectrums of our social/political/economic/communal lives...
let's see if it works now
It does!
Testing upload
Nobody on the Fediverse seems to have families.
Sometimes if you read their profiles they claim to have families but then that claim is almost never reflected in what they post.
Likewise, nobody seems to exist in political units at levels lower than the national.
I believe that the Fediverse has become a waystation on our way to turning ourselves into bots, a way of rendering us ineffective in what we, with increasing derision, call "the real world".
#SeizeTheMeansOfCommunity
Sk8er boi, what a banger
I.e. knowing that political struggles exist without knowing between which group and resorting to a brainless rage that either becomes oppressive, or completely sterile against oppressors. White I was in the closet I'd feel attacked in my masculinity but only in that I was disabled; it was culturally my autism that was wrong and to be fixed, not my behaviour as a "man". Similarly it's probably made me stay in the closet as a trans woman for an unknown number of years, because I had to carry the burden of my disability-"masculinity".
R*pe mention, TW politics (I believe it may trigger panic attacks)
Of course pulling that under the rug to strenghten an authoritarian narrative can only strenghten or legitimize the oppressions happening on capitalistic social media, between mostly abused people, because of this mechanism. It also undeniably exposes these people to real-life abuse. But the authoritarian politicians serving this narrative also happen to be predators and rapists – maybe the smartest, relatively speaking, and probably the most successful ones.
I don't know if speech should be regulated (I don't think so, e.g. calling out a public servant's racism is illegal in France) but a specific form of so-called "hate speech" is the only form that an agonistic perspective on communications and information deprived of cognitive resources (because the marketing competences that make capitalistic social media successful are used to typify both the public and the people who've signed their TOS and target... woopsie, marginalized teenagers) can take, so I'm writing that down in my list of bullshit excuses to control our interactions.
I.e. knowing that political struggles exist without knowing between which group and resorting to a brainless rage that either becomes oppressive, or completely sterile against oppressors. White I was in the closet I'd feel attacked in my masculinity but only in that I was disabled; it was culturally my autism that was wrong and to be fixed, not my behaviour as a "man". Similarly it's probably made me stay in the closet as a trans woman for an unknown number of years, because I had to carry the burden of my disability-"masculinity".
Rant about an interesting lecture at my university
The issue with free speech online isn’t that it’s too broad but that online platforms don’t respect it when they encourage their users to shorten their messages (e.g. Twitter characters limit for merely sending a message or the Facebook one to display larger text on a silly background).
The teacher has said a lot of interesting stuff e.g. that users constructed their own bubble filters (which IMHO is due to both trolling and more generally the appearance of conflicting values, which I don’t perceive either as a trans woman or while tracting – we can always discuss a bit – and leads to total institutions, which means that in order to spare marginalized people we need to foster actual conversation and to positively show that we don’t advocate for conflicting values, to listen to our correspondants’) but this "solutions" part was really fucked up; I’ve literally mentioned Lessig’s four cardinal points for activism and he comes up with a sort of GDPR on free speech (which was, on personal data, bullshit, btw, except for the spam because the problem was that it was unexpensive, Hashcoin was meant to solve this and has lead to Bitcoin unfortunately).
I don't know if speech should be regulated (I don't think so, e.g. calling out a public servant's racism is illegal in France) but a specific form of so-called "hate speech" is the only form that an agonistic perspective on communications and information deprived of cognitive resources (because the marketing competences that make capitalistic social media successful are used to typify both the public and the people who've signed their TOS and target... woopsie, marginalized teenagers) can take, so I'm writing that down in my list of bullshit excuses to control our interactions.
I don't speak on behalf of @BonfireBuilders but I was talking to Ivan about the new design system, and defining circles as part of what he's currently calling 'spaces'.
This sounds like what you might be talking about with a 'virtual group environment' @bhaugen?
Can I try any of that yet? If so, how and where? If not, when?
