Discussion
i agree, atm we put everything on the table but making hard life for users to actually use boundaries (or whatever they'll be called) - thinking what could be the best way to improve the UX collectively, maybe a series of open design workshop in september?
I have a suggestion for Bonfire:
@BonfireBuilders #bonfire_feedback
It seems strange that the topic view doesn't displays nested comments.
What is a topic, a more "stable" place for discussion and moderation (which would benefit from nesting), a collection of things that belong together (more like tags), or an automated user (as topics are "boosting" posts)??
Being the topic an AP actor, other users can follow and receive notification each time something get published (and automatically re-boosted by the topic)
I have a suggestion for Bonfire:
@BonfireBuilders #bonfire_feedback
The identity that wrote a post shouldn't get notifications about that same post.
Your suggestion is to merge them together?
Circle I think makes sense. But due to social network nomenclature, maybe group or camp members would work better? If you want individuals to understand what they are using, similar verbs may be necessary for similar concepts. Otherwise, it can produce confusion regardless of the intention for simplicity or clarity.
I agree boundaries is not an ideal term, but not because it is abstract, it just doen't fit 100%. Bounded posts are not changing their shape, or growing or shrinking in size. They have certain rules about who can see and interact with them. It is like every post can be its own little forum. My suggestion would be rules or access.
I have a suggestion for Bonfire:
@BonfireBuilders #bonfire_feedback
It seems strange that the topic view doesn't displays nested comments.
What is a topic, a more "stable" place for discussion and moderation (which would benefit from nesting), a collection of things that belong together (more like tags), or an automated user (as topics are "boosting" posts)??
I want to see how topics work!
Your suggestion is to merge them together?
Might be my lack of understanding, but I'm assuming that by defining a 'circle' I'm adding a group of people to a list.
This is different to creating a 'boundary' where I'm defining permissions of the people in that list in relation to my posts.
Is that right? At the moment, I feel like the circle/boundary language could be clearer?
I have a suggestion for Bonfire:
If i am viewing someone else's profile (at the top of the page or scrolled down anywhere on their page) and click the link for my profile in the top left the URL in the browser changes to my profile yet I still see the same profile I was looking at (and it scrolls back to the top of their profile).
@BonfireBuilders #bonfire_feedback
I have a suggestion for Bonfire:
@BonfireBuilders #bonfire_feedback
Hmm, I can "Flag" myself from my profile?
I have a suggestion for Bonfire:
@BonfireBuilders #bonfire_feedback
First bug!
When adding a profile avatar (go to profile, then edit and click the avatar to choose a new one) the image does not update at this time to show the chosen image. But if you "Save" the profile anyway your new avatar does now show correctly.
Hey all, so how's everyone getting on with circles/boundaries?
Install Bonfire Playground
Get the full app experience
