I want to see how topics work!
@dajbelshaw @bonfire @Supernova interesting, tough creating a circle and assing permissions to them are 2 separated actions (and happens in different times and page)
Your suggestion is to merge them together?
@dajbelshaw @bonfire @Supernova @ivan how about using terminology of a campfire? Something like campgrounds for boundary? Users may be more familiar with the naming more than abstract nature of the word boundaries.
Circle I think makes sense. But due to social network nomenclature, maybe group or camp members would work better? If you want individuals to understand what they are using, similar verbs may be necessary for similar concepts. Otherwise, it can produce confusion regardless of the intention for simplicity or clarity.
@bonfire @Supernova Yeah, I think that 'boundary' is a confusing name (in terms of UX, at least) as opposed to 'circle' 😆
@dajbelshaw @bonfire @Supernova interesting, tough creating a circle and assing permissions to them are 2 separated actions (and happens in different times and page)
Your suggestion is to merge them together?
@dajbelshaw @bonfire I am also somewhat confused. I can add multiple people and circles to a boundary? I am not sure if I am supposed to use boundaries at sets of circles and people (a boundary for all I might want to share photos with) or if boundaries are more to specify groups that have certain permissions or abilities (can view not boost my posts).
@bonfire @Supernova Yeah, I think that 'boundary' is a confusing name (in terms of UX, at least) as opposed to 'circle' 😆
@mayel @ivan Love the circles/boundaries stuff! 🤘
Might be my lack of understanding, but I'm assuming that by defining a 'circle' I'm adding a group of people to a list.
This is different to creating a 'boundary' where I'm defining permissions of the people in that list in relation to my posts.
Is that right? At the moment, I feel like the circle/boundary language could be clearer?
@dajbelshaw @bonfire I am also somewhat confused. I can add multiple people and circles to a boundary? I am not sure if I am supposed to use boundaries at sets of circles and people (a boundary for all I might want to share photos with) or if boundaries are more to specify groups that have certain permissions or abilities (can view not boost my posts).
I have a suggestion for Bonfire:
If i am viewing someone else's profile (at the top of the page or scrolled down anywhere on their page) and click the link for my profile in the top left the URL in the browser changes to my profile yet I still see the same profile I was looking at (and it scrolls back to the top of their profile).
@BonfireBuilders #bonfire_feedback
I have a suggestion for Bonfire:
@BonfireBuilders #bonfire_feedback
Hmm, I can "Flag" myself from my profile?
I have a suggestion for Bonfire:
@BonfireBuilders #bonfire_feedback
First bug!
When adding a profile avatar (go to profile, then edit and click the avatar to choose a new one) the image does not update at this time to show the chosen image. But if you "Save" the profile anyway your new avatar does now show correctly.
Hey all, so how's everyone getting on with circles/boundaries?
Hello, there!
BoldItalic
Quote
- List
- Item
# Wow! Markdown is supported) def hello(name: str) -> str: return 'Hello %s' % name
😊 Certes nous pouvons influer à notre petite échelle individuelle sur le changement climatique en cours, mais … 🥵
The point in an online microblogging exchange [elsewhere, not on Bonfire] where I am moved to invoke "Quine", "ostension", "inscrutability of reference", "Lakoff", and "prototype effects" is the point at which I find it necessary to tell myself to slowly back away from the keyboard ...
Past events exist, after all, only in memory, which is a form of imagination. The event is real now, but once it’s then, its continuing reality is entirely up to us.
👉 C'est le mois d'août ! 👈
¿ La fête du slip 🤔 ? Oui, ¡mais pas que !
Ami·e·s végétalien·ne·s, c'est aussi les 🍈 fruits et les légumes 🥒 frais comme s'il en pleuvait … et en local, c'est encore meilleur !
@Azuredusk10 wow this is so great, thanks for putting so much thoughts on it 😍 😍
This is quite a sincronicity indeed, because we are having this discussion again with @mayel since the past week.
It makes me wonder 2 things:
- Your initiative is an opportunity to try to develop such crucial feature (both in terms of user adoption and in term of economic sustainability) in the open and together with the community
- We can move the actual bonfire mockups design system from figma to penpot, and try to make it more accessible for other designers to use / improve it
@Azuredusk10 @bonfire @fediverse @ivan
Having worked on a lot of projects with low/no budget, particularly at their beginning, I wonder if a good 'solidarity' support structure could be designed?
Im thinking free to get going, with some explanation of resources required to keep it going and requests for contributions.
Maybe some easy way for the hoster to have good visibility into resource usage and to trigger requests - that could optionally go out to the instance 'admin' and/or their users (give the admin some choices)
Also have some clearly defined streams for regular contributions where you may then avoid requests
Opportunity for anyone who may be interested in learning how to program Elixir (the main language in Bonfire): twitter.com/thejuliams/statu...
The playground has been upgraded with a few tweaks plus an initial release of the topics functionality. Keen to see how you all use it! We need to add some docs, but in the meantime you should know you can tag a topic in a post by using + for a mention instead of @, so for example +bonfire +fediverse
Discussions about tools for co-ops and more generally tools that are co-operative in nature
